<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Looters And Moochers &#187; Principle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lootersandmoochers.info/tag/principle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info</link>
	<description>Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John Galt and the reason for the strike</title>
		<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info/fighting-the-looters/106-106.php</link>
		<comments>http://lootersandmoochers.info/fighting-the-looters/106-106.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fighting the Looters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Galt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lootersandmoochers.info/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br />John Galt Speaks on the strike Their plan—like all the plans of all the royal looters of the past—is only that the loot shall last their lifetime. It has always lasted before, because in one generation they could not run out of victims. But this time—it will not last. The victims are on strike. We [...]<br /><script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>John Galt Speaks on the strike</p>
<blockquote><p>Their plan—like all the plans of all the royal looters of the past—is only that the loot shall last their lifetime. It has always lasted before, because in one generation they could not run out of victims. But this time—it will not last. The victims are on strike. We are on strike against martyrdom—and against the moral code that demands it. We are on strike against those who believe that one man must exist for the sake of another. We are on strike against the morality of cannibals, be it practiced in body or in spirit. We will not deal with men on any terms but ours—and our terms are a moral code which holds that man is an end in himself and not the means to any end of others. We do not seek to force our code upon them. They are free to believe what they please. But, for once, they will have to believe it and to exist—without our help. And, once and for all, they will learn the meaning of their creed. That creed has lasted for centuries solely by the sanction of the victims—by means of the victims&#8217; acceptance of punishment for breaking a code impossible to practice. But that code was intended to be broken. It is a code that thrives not on those who observe it, but on those who don&#8217;t, a morality kept in existence not by virtue of its saints, but by the grace of its shiners. We have decided not to be sinners any longer. We have ceased breaking that moral code. We shall blast it out of existence forever by the one method that it can&#8217;t withstand: by obeying it. We are obeying it. We are complying. In dealing with our fellow men, we are observing their code of values to the letter and sparing them all the evils they denounce. The mind is evil? We have withdrawn the works of our minds from society, and not a single idea of ours is to be known or used by men. Ability is a selfish evil that leaves no chance to those who are less able? We have withdrawn from the competition and left all chances open to incompetents. The pursuit of wealth is greed, the root of all evil? We do not seek to make fortunes any longer. It is evil to earn more than one&#8217;s bare sustenance? We take nothing but the lowliest jobs and we produce, by the effort of our muscles, no more than we consume for our immediate needs—with not a penny nor an inventive thought left over to harm the world. It is evil to succeed, since success is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? We have ceased burdening the weak with our ambition and have left them free to prosper without us. It is evil to be an employer? We have no employment to offer. It is evil to own property? We own nothing. It is evil to enjoy one&#8217;s existence in this world? There is no form of enjoyment that we seek from their world, and—this was hardest for us to attain—what we now feel for their world is that emotion which they preach as an ideal: indifference—the blank—the zero—the mark of death. . . .<br />
We are giving men everything they&#8217;ve professed to want and to seek as virtue for centuries. Now let them see whether they want it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Atlas Shrugged<br />
Ayn Rand<br />
1957</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lootersandmoochers.info/fighting-the-looters/106-106.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can anyone explain the contradiction of Ayn Rand Objectivism to me?</title>
		<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info/philosophy/can-anyone-explain-the-contradiction-of-ayn-rand-objectivism-to-me-10.php</link>
		<comments>http://lootersandmoochers.info/philosophy/can-anyone-explain-the-contradiction-of-ayn-rand-objectivism-to-me-10.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lootersandmoochers.info/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br />brianwilsonrocks!!!!!!!!! asked: Objectivism is basically a philosophy steeped in the principle that you should worry about you and you alone, and caring about other people is not your problem. So how come all these humanitarians like Angelina Jolie and Neil Peart&#8211;the people that you see on TV adopting African babies and raising awareness about the [...]<br /><script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>
<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a relpost="nofollow" href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ayn_rand2.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ayn_rand2.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>brianwilsonrocks!!!!!!!!!</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/>Objectivism is basically a philosophy steeped in the principle that you should worry about you and you alone, and caring about other people is not your problem. So how come all these humanitarians like Angelina Jolie and Neil Peart&#8211;the people that you see on TV adopting African babies and raising awareness about the situation in Tibet (like we don&#8217;t know already)&#8211;are such self-proclaimed fans of Ayn Rand? It doesn&#8217;t seem to make much sense.<br/><br/><a relpost="nofollow" href='http://answers.yahoo.com'>Powered By Yahoo Answers</a></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lootersandmoochers.info/philosophy/can-anyone-explain-the-contradiction-of-ayn-rand-objectivism-to-me-10.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
