<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Looters And Moochers &#187; Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lootersandmoochers.info/tag/money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info</link>
	<description>Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers Government and Money</title>
		<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info/looters/lawyers-government-and-money-426.php</link>
		<comments>http://lootersandmoochers.info/looters/lawyers-government-and-money-426.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Looters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lootersandmoochers.info/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br />This is very interesting!  I never thought about it this way. Perhaps this is why so many physicians are conservatives or republicans. The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers’ Party. Barack Obama is a lawyer. Michelle Obama is a lawyer. Hillary Clinton is a lawyer. Bill Clinton is a lawyer. John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth [...]<br /><script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">This is very interesting!  I never thought about it this     way. Perhaps this is why so many physicians are conservatives or     republicans.</p>
<p>The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers’ Party.</p>
<p>Barack Obama is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Michelle Obama is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Bill Clinton is a lawyer.</p>
<p>John Edwards is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Elizabeth Edwards is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although     Gore did not graduate).</p>
<p>Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except     for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.</p>
<p>Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:</p>
<p>Harry Reid is a lawyer.</p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi is a lawyer.</p>
<p>The Republican Party is different.</p>
<p>President Bush is a businessman.</p>
<p>Vice President Cheney is a businessman.</p>
<p>The leaders of the Republican Revolution:</p>
<p>Newt Gingrich was a history professor.</p>
<p>Tom Delay was an exterminator. Dick Armey was an     economist.</p>
<p>House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic     manufacturer.</p>
<p>The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart     surgeon.</p>
<p>Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer?      Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican     nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in     1976.  The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work,     who are often the targets of lawyers.</p>
<p>The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.  Democrats mock     and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the     sick, like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich.</p>
<p>The Lawyers’ Party sees these sorts of people, who provide     goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America.      And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the     Lawyers’ Party, grow.</p>
<p>Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?  Pharmaceutical     companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant     chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of     value in our nation.</p>
<p>This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through     the eyes of lawyers.  Lawyers solve problems by successfully     representing their clients, in this case the American people.  Lawyers     seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press     appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language     to favor their side.</p>
<p>Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine.      But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.  When politicians as     lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as     opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes     all-consuming.  Some Americans become “adverse parties” of our very     government.  We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action     suit.  We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of     freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.</p>
<p>Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial     decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts     of our once private lives.  America has a place for laws and     lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and     unchecked.  When the most important decision for our next president is     whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law     in America is too big.  When lawyers use criminal     prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means, as happened in     the lynching of Scooter Libby and Tom Delay, then the power of lawyers     in America is too great.  When House Democrats     sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our     enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation     in America has become crushing.</p>
<p>We cannot expect the Lawyers’ Party to provide real change,     real reform or real hope in America   Most Americans know     that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by     nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in     1789.  Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU     lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders.  Most Americans intuit     that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or     spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy..</p>
<p>Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be     brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American     society and business.  Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not     come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard     work.  Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with     more power will only make our problems worse.</p>
<p>The United States has 5% of the world’s population     and 66% of the world’s lawyers! Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been     introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit     punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as “spilling hot coffee on     yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you” and also to limit     punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has     continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party.     When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American     Trial Lawyers Association goes to the Democrat Party, then you realize who     is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high!</p>
<p><strong>Please &#8212; DO  PASS  THIS  ON!!!</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lootersandmoochers.info/looters/lawyers-government-and-money-426.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many of you think that &#8220;Atlas Shrugged&#8221; by Ayn Rand is relevant in these times?</title>
		<link>http://lootersandmoochers.info/books-authors/how-many-of-you-think-that-atlas-shrugged-by-ayn-rand-is-relevant-in-these-times-38.php</link>
		<comments>http://lootersandmoochers.info/books-authors/how-many-of-you-think-that-atlas-shrugged-by-ayn-rand-is-relevant-in-these-times-38.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books & Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlas Shrugged By Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lootersandmoochers.info/books-authors/how-many-of-you-think-that-atlas-shrugged-by-ayn-rand-is-relevant-in-these-times-38.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br />RiteshA asked: I felt there are learnings to take from the book, but I was confused as to what in today&#8217;s world can we say the book is against. Today, anyone who has a good idea id given all credit for it, and allowed to make money out of it, and no one despises them [...]<br /><script type="text/javascript"><!--
prosperent_uid = 215780;
/*Looters, created on 7/14/10*/
prosperent_unit = 8473276;
prosperent_ad_width = 728;
prosperent_ad_height = 18;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://prosperent.com/js/ad.js">
</script><br /><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ayn_rand_money2.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ayn_rand_money2.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>RiteshA</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/>I felt there are learnings to take from the book, but I was confused as to what in today&#8217;s world can we say the book is against. Today, anyone who has a good idea id given all credit for it, and allowed to make money out of it, and no one despises them that. What do you feel?<br />
I don&#8217;t know id I did not put it clearly. I think though it is a good book, it is not relevant anymore. As the enemy (the one who talks about &#8220;social welfare&#8221; and despises rich) no more exists. Evenyone loves merit! And that is what the book advocates.<br/><br/><a href='http://answers.yahoo.com'>Powered By Yahoo Answers</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lootersandmoochers.info/books-authors/how-many-of-you-think-that-atlas-shrugged-by-ayn-rand-is-relevant-in-these-times-38.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

